Autobiography

Petrus Toxy

 

SiteLock

Petrus Toxy

Autobiography

Preface.

 

Ignorance breeds rumors.

 

Legal work for employers and minorities breeds doxing.

 

Here comes knowledge about me directly from the source.

 

I was born into an entrepreneurial family.

 

I have following professional experience; I have been employed, entrepreneur and manager in small- and medium size Enterprises.

I'm an inventor and a developer.

 

 

I have run several companies simultaneously. When I have not run several companies at the same time, I have often run one company and been studying full time. When I have not run companies while I have been studying, I have often been studying more than full time.

I have been studying up to 250 % per semester. My max capacity during one semester has so far been: two B.A. plus additional 102 credits (hp). The "normal" is 30 credits per semester.

I have following experience from following industries: 3-parts trade (3y), construction (9y), export & import (10y), factoring (7y), fast food (3y), finance (7y), health care (3y), legal services (ongoing), security (8y), and I have been EH since 1985.

 

EH since 1985.

 

In 1980 my brother introduced me to Basic, COBOL, Pascal. In those days we didn't have any home computer. They was still too expensive, at least to our family. My brother used those few computers you could find in schools in those days.

For you who don't know, home computers were a class of microcomputers entering the market in 1977, and becoming common during the 1980's. In Sweden the home computers got their break throw with Commondore 64 in mid 1980's. I got my first own home computer in 1985.

 

"War Games" and my brother took me to EH. In those days CCC was the coolest cyberpunks you could be involved with. EH is a night hobby since 1985.

I became almost directly interested in 6502 ML and in late 1980's I was introduced to malware by some friends.

 

In Sweden, where everyone must be equal, the Intelligence surplus finds its own paths to vent. One of ways can be hacking.

 

"The Cuckoo's Egg" was an eye-opener. It led me to Bash, Bourne, C, cryptography, GNU/Linux, UNIX, and I widened my interest for Shell. Cryptography led me to Prime.

I went on to: AJAX, ASP, C#, CSS, HTML, PHP, SQL, Win, and I fell deeper for Perl, the duck tape of Internet.

 

I became quite late interested in: C++, Java, JS, Python.

In 2000's my network security skills helped a Swedish intelligence unit. This was during my virtual map out of undemocratic groups. My map out was the first full scale map out in Sweden, when it comes to undemocratic groups and their connections abroad.

I did the map out in six month. I did it alone.

According to the head of the intelligence unit, I saved the unit one year's work.

 

In late 2000's smartphones sparked my interests in Android, BB, iOS, Symbian. It led me back to NOS.

 

In 2010's I became interested in vehicle network systems and the security enabled to prevent manipulation of these systems.

 

Stuxnet made me in 2010's curious in Lua. Now R, ROS and Ruby are in the pipeline.

 

During AI studies from 2007 to nowadays I have study CUDA, LISP, MATLAB, PROLOG, TensorFlow and other.

 

I have undergone online courses at: Berkeley, MIT, Stanford, Yale among other.

 

Pattern recognition have helped me find the red core in fuzzy information. I use my pattern recognition in cryptography and in supervision of code.

 

My special interest is malware. Malware such as e g Stuxnet are like a Mona Lisa.

Pure artistry.

 

Metamorphic Virus is a personal specialty. Its sophistication is like imbibe a glass of the finest Champagne.

 

I'm in the ground an academic historian with undemocratic groups, as my specialty.

 

After years in the business world and in the security branch I started study at law school.

IT law became early my specialization. But. I have also a very good experience of labor law and I have a deep interest in international law.

In international law I'm especially interested in the Israel / Palestine-arabic - issue.

 

In 2014 I took a dubbel B.A. The B.A. was in History and Archaelogy.

 

In history my speciality since 1990's is right-wing extremism, left-wing extremism and islamism and their connections to other undemocratic groups and terrorism.

 

In archaeology my speciality is marine archaeology

 

I'm with other words also in addition a trained archaeologist, with specilization in marine archaeology.

My specialty in archeology is Carelian shipping and community structures from the Stone Age to the Crusades. My thesis concerning Carelian community structures and navigation from the Stone Age to the Crusades was the first thesis of its kind in Sweden. I wrote my thesis in archaeology in 1990's. My Professor was extremly critical to my thesis and we two was not even at the same page, not in the same book. I got from him very low grades for my research work in archaeology.

10 years later excavations in Carelia proved that my thesis was correct. I was right. My Professor had been wrong all the time.

My Professor was man enought to admit that I was right, but he did it almost 24 years later in 2014, then the harm was already done what comes to my low grades in archaelogy. This detail tells you a lot of how the academic world works.

 

Archaeology is by the way a field that you can use when creating artificial intelligence. So are also history. A combination of Archaeology, history and computer science is unbeatable when creating artificial intelligence.

 

At the side of archeology I have studied Ancient world and society (Classics), focusing on the 4000 years of history of the Jewish people and on the 3000 years of history of Israel, and the 1000 years of history of Roman Empire.

 

These timeperiods are still today affecting us in several fields, from law to traditions.

 

In 2016 I was selected to the world's first self-driving car Engineer Nanodegree Program, at Udacity, in USA. I was one of 250 selected applicants from all over the world to the first course round. The program is at advanced level in the field of machine learning.

The program was created in collaboration between industry (BMW, NVIDIA, MB, Silicon Valley and others) and Udacity of course.

 

In 2018 I took my Jurisprudence exam.

 

During my time in Law School I have studied extra courses in law foremost in business law and advanced tax law, but also in economics.

 

In 2019 I will take my Master in History, with specialization in ICT history.

Anonymous, Cyberpunkt and malware in all forms lays near my hearth.

Cyberpunkt and malware devop have been a part of my life since 1980's and Anonymous since the term was born in fall 2003. Today Internet is far away from what Internet was ment to be acording to the the forefathers of the Internet. The Internet today is a real shame to all Western democratic societies contrubuting to make it a virtual fascist state.

1984 was not ment to be used as a manual.

 

In 2021 I will take my exam in Sociology. Also in sociology right-wing extremism, left-wing extremism and islamism and their connections to other undemocratic groups and terrorism lays near my hearth, but so does virtual sub-cultures and organized crime and developing an understanding how a Western democratic society can make these to the Western democratic society destructiv individuls to a constructiv part of the Western democratic society.

 

In 2021 I will take my B.Sc in Computer Science, with Coumputer Science as my major and Software Development as my specialization. Network Security in all forms lays near my hearth. Especially advance offensive network security and intelligent software devop.

 

 

Introduction.

 

Mapping out the right- and left wing extremism.

 

Historian's task.

 

Manifesto. Historian's task is to study how it was in the past. "In the past," is everything that is not present. "In the past" is what happened thousands of years ago, but also what happened one second ago.

We historians write history for ourselves. We are making history for our children and future generations. The history needs to be written to those who survived. The history needs to be written and rewritten to suit the experience, needs and interests of those who are living and to those who will live in future.

Historians want to show that historical knowledge provides a better understanding of our own time and the future.

The Historians interpretation of the past plays a central role in our actions in here and now, which affect our future.

A Historian must dare bring uncomfortable truths in the light, and not only what is the fashion of the day.

A Historian must dare to participate in public debate. The Historian must dare to correct false conclusions even if the conclusions are in violation of the Historian's personal values.

A Historian must dare to leave his/her desk.

The Historian's biggest enemy is the Historian himself. A Historian must disclose his background. A Historian must constantly critically examine himselves and dare to correct his/her earlier conclusions.

 

The Historian's only loyalty rests to research.

Undemocratic groups.

 

"Freedom is free, but freedom don't come free." / Petrus Toxy

 

Many undemocratic groups, from-right-to-left and Islamists on the side, has a high security thinking. The only way historians who choose to leave their desks can map out these groups is to do it in person.

 

I have as a historian mapped out right-wing extremism. I did in late 1990's and 2000/2001 the first virtual map out of the Swedish right-wing extremism and through my map out I put light on the Swedish right-wing extremism virtual connections to other undemocratic groups.

 

My last map out was left-wing extremism and the left-wing extremisms' connections to the Swedish Sociald Democratic Party, the Swedish Left Party, the Swedish Green Party and the trade unions LO and SAC. A spin-off of this map out was to see how the links between LO and Sweden Democrats looked like.

As the icing on the cake I lighted out links between the Swedish Social Democrats, the Swedish Left Party, the Swedish Green Party and Islamists incl islamic terrororganizations.

 

The fact that I have examined both right- and left-wing extremism is rare in Sweden.

It's common to map either or. What the most historians and journalists map out are based on what sells - what sells since after the World War II is to write about right-wing extremism, but what don't sell in Sweden is to map out the left-wing extremism.

Especially if the tracks are leading inside the trade union LO and the Swedish Social Democratic Party. Then it sudden becomes a big no-no in Sweden.

This is because Swedes since childhood have been programmed within uncritical mythical image of what the LO and the Swedish Social Democrats stands for. In this uncritical mythical image, LO and the Swedish Social Democratic Party stands for all what's "good" in the Swedish society. This mythological image have existed since the entry of the Swedish welfare state in the 1930's and the concept of the all "People's Home". The concept of the all "People's Home" (in Swedish "Folkhemmet") is originated from a bourgeois concept, but in January 18th, 1928, the concept was launched as a socialist concept by the Swedish Social Democratic leader Per Albin Hansson. The goal was to unify Sweden under the rule of the Socialdemocrats with ideas such as "one language, one people, one country".

This mythological image of the Swedish Social Democratic Party and LO standing for all the "good" in the Swedish society have been reinforced since 1968, when several of those who were an active part of the so-called "68-left" (the Swedish revolutionary left) went on with their lives and got high positions in the Swedish society as politicians and journalists.

This influence from the 68-left in high positions in the Swedish society have led to the fact that the Swedish Social Democratic Party have had a strong influence on Swedish policy, also when the Swedish Social Democratic Party themselves have not been a part of the Swedish government as in 70's, 90's, 00's and 10's. The fact that the Swedish Social Democratic Part have had power to by the 68-left in high positions influence the Swedish policy also when they have not been a part of the Swedish government have also made it possible to continue launch a mythical image that the trade union LO and the Swedish Social Democratic Party stands for all the "good" in Sweden, in opposit to all the other parties.

Today more parts of the Swedish society, than the Swedish Social Democrats and LO are seen as a part of this mythical image of "goodness". Today the whole left, from the far left to the right side of the left are in Sweden seen as the "good" force.

An important part of this process creating and keeping this mythological image of that the "left" stands for all the goodness in the Swedish society are as mentioned journalists in Swedish media, then the most Swedish journalists have in some grade left-wing sympathies.

Some journalists have also themselves a background in the Swedish left-wing extremism. With left-wing extremism is ment in this case e g ANTIFA.

In this guise it is no wonder that the left-wing extremism in Sweden are not illustrated in the same negative light as e g the right-wing extremism are illustrated in. In the end of the day both these extremist wings are different sides of the undemocratic coin.

Hence the greater acceptance of the so-called "good violence" ("Det goda våldet") which the "left" in Sweden exerts on its opponents. The "good violence" consists of everything from defamation to the criminal damage and aggravated assault. The "good violence" occurs both on the Internet, in the virtual world as in the physical world. Among those who practice this "good violence" can be found members from the Swedish Left Party, the Swedish Green Party and the trade unions LO and SAC, to even smaller parties and organizations on the farleft, if you choose to see politics as a from the left to the right going line.

 

Continue will follow...

 

 

 

"The very ink with which history is written is merely fluid prejudice." / Mark Twain

 

Is it worth it?

 

"Is it worth it?", That is a question I often get.

 

Let's turn the tables - ask yourself - is it worth in a Western democratic society, daring to lift the lid and see what simmers in obscurity?

 

Is it for the survival of the Western democracy worth daring to follow the tracks behind the scenes?

 

Is it worth defending the Western democracy and the Free world?

 

Democracy is something we take for granted. It is only when we do not have democracy, we will realize the fragile with the western democracy, but then it's already too late.

 

In the world there are millions of people whom every day believe that it is worth dying for democracy, if not for their own sake, then for their children's sake.

 

My answer is - I believe it is worth protecting our Western democracy, if not for my sake, then for mine and your children's sake.

 

I expect that the democracy protects me, if not for my sake, then for the sake of my children.

So far, the Swedish democratic society has not defended me, neither for my or my children's sake.

 

Today contacting the Swedish Law Enforcement Agencies are as making a phonecall to a connection without a subscription:

 

"(Error signal) The number you have tried reach has no subscription" - no crimes is investigated, report after report is maculated.

 

"Democracy must be built through open societies that share information. When there is information, there is enlightenment. When there is debate, there are solutions. When there is no sharing of power, no rule of law, no accountability, there is abuse, corruption, subjugation and indignation."

/ Atifete Jahjaga

 

 

What do you think yourself?

 

Do you think it's worth standing up for democracy?

 

If you think it is worth standing up for democracy, stand then behind it in both word and deed. Not only in dead words. Talk is cheap.

I'm not talking about boo-shouts, key rings razzeling and whistlin when e g the Swedish Democrats want to speak.

In a Western democratic society everyone has the right to speak as long as they do not violate the current constitution. This is the delicate with democracy, that democracy is prepared to sacrifice his own survival, for everyone to have their say. In a democratic society, everyone should be heard, even those we who care about people's equal values don't ourselves wish to be heard.

What I'm instead are talking about is the words and actions of everyday life. Break everyday racism in the public space - what I nowadays call the everyday xenophobia. This is because we now know that races do not biologically exists within Homo sapiens sapiens, we are all the same, and therefore we should not even use a discourse, as that the discourse were true.

 

Break the everyday xenophobia. Break the everyday extremism in the public domain.

Do not sit quietly and watch when the people around you are slandered, harassed, threatened with death, because they belong to a minority, because they stand up for the current constitution, because they stand up for the Western democracy, which incl. freedom of speech and which incl. free information, as long as the words do not meet the conditions limits for a crime.

 

Do not assume that a certain kind of threat or violence is justified, because there is only one kind of threats and violence - the unjust threats and the unjust violence.

 

Do not assume that democracy includes the right to overturn the democratic society.

 

Personally, I think it is worth standing up for Western democracy. Although its costs comes in the shape of threats and hate.

 

 

 

Petrus Toxy

 

 

/ Petrus Toxy

Double B.A. (2014);

Jurisprudences Exam (2018);

Jur.stud. (LL.M. 2019);

Master stud. in History (Master's Degree 2019);

B.Sc.stud. (B.Sc.in Computer Science 2021.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Copyright © All Rights Reserved. Petrus Toxy 2011.